Showing posts with label Message. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Message. Show all posts

Friday, November 27, 2009

Looking back at change

This is now 5 years old how much do you think things have changed?

this was taken form http://www.gwu.edu/~ccps/etzioni/B471.html

471. “Red State, Blue State, Light Meat, Dark Meat.” Forward (November 26, 2004).


As my students were packing to go home for Thanksgiving, I asked them what effect "Post-Election Stress Syndrome" was going to have on their holidays. Only two expected any troubles.

One explained that his parents were dyed-in-the-wool Republicans and that they would tease him mercilessly for having worked his tail off as a volunteer for the Kerry campaign in Pennsylvania. He, in turn, would resent their support of a president who was making him consider moving to Canada for the next four years, if not longer. "It's going to be a rough Thanksgiving," he concluded.

Another student said that his parents were even more liberal than he was and that the whole family was sure to spend the holiday despondent, bemoaning the fate of the nation and wondering — in the inimical words of the British tabloid The Daily Mirror — "How can 59,054,087 people be so DUMB?" Above all, he both resented and was more than a bit envious of the few Republican students he knew who were oozing a deep sense of satisfaction as they prepared to go home and sit down to a meal of profound and all-around thanksgiving.

The other students demurred. One scoffed at the notion that politics were that important: "This holiday season isn't going to be any different from any other. We'll stuff our faces and watch football games until we're bleary-eyed. Stupid little lights will appear all over the place, mixed with plastic Santa Clauses, as we start the shop-till-you-drop Christmas season. The malls will be as full as they were last year, and the elevators will play the same tired tunes all over again. It all will be as familiar and comfortable as a well-worn pair of shoes."

No wonder, I said to myself, she is the best sociology student I have had in years.

I, too, believe that the holiday season will allow the healing to begin, to remind most Americans — all but the diehard liberals, of which there are surprisingly few outside of Manhattan, San Francisco and elite college campuses — that we are one nation, after all, and that we have much for which to be thankful. Most Americans will have an ample meal to sit down to, a roof over their head and the warmth of a properly heated home and of family members assembled from near and far — even if there are going to be the inevitable squabbles that mark such relationships.

Some families will avoid discussing politics altogether. Others will count it as a blessing that the elections were, by and large, fair and clean, recalling how concerned they were just a few weeks ago that the nation would face the trials of weeks of contested decisions, lawsuits, "Six Floridas," a loss of legitimacy of the democratic process and the possibility of becoming the world's laughingstock — all of which we were spared, for which much thanksgiving is due.

Indeed, the holiday season will serve well the partial reconciliation that has already begun. I say "partial" because not all Americans will be reconciled to four more years of President Bush or to the idea that they will have to share the same nation with 50 million people they consider religious bigots. Nor will the reconciliation of those who will calm down be complete. And Bush's next moves, both foreign and domestic, are likely to feed their remaining resentment.

However, despite all the rhetoric to the contrary, nobody I know is packing. Most are pondering where the Democrats should go next, rather than giving up on politics or talking about supporting some kind of Ralph Nader next time around. The very fact that for the weeks to come, most Americans will be absorbed in doing the same things they having been doing for years during the Thanksgiving/Christmas season should remind us that the American society is a resilient one and that there is a full and rich life — even after an important election loss.

Reconciliation will be greatly eased by the fact that the divisions, the often repeated claims of polarization, were overblown to begin with. The notion that liberals occupy the two coasts and that the rest of nation is GOP land, or that there are states whose citizens hold to blue or red views, is a media artifact. Most blue states have many red citizens, and vice versa. True, in a winner-takes-all election, it looks as if New York has no upstate; as if New York City has no Staten Island; as if Orange County is not in California, or as if there are only Republicans in the Midwest and Mountain states.

However, a closer look shows that although many states were eventually called red or blue, Bush and John Kerry actually ran neck and neck in them, within a few percentage points of each other. Take Ohio, for example, which was called red with roughly 51% of the votes going to Bush and around 48.5%to Kerry; or New Hampshire, hailed blue with Kerry receiving about 50% of the votes and Bush 49%.

Moreover, most "red" people have some blue views and beliefs, and most "blue" people are far from fully blue. Elections, which force them to reduce all subtleties and nuances to one vote, make them look like one-dimensional creatures. A quick read of Morris Fiorina's "Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America" or of Alan Wolfe's "One Nation, After All," however, makes it clear that Americans are much more complex. It turns out that there are gay conservatives, pro-life Democrats, and so on and so on.

I do not seek to make light of the bitterness of the last election, fueled by, among other things, the injection of religious absolutes into politics. It is much easier to reach compromises on tax rates and expenditures for various social programs than on abortion, school prayer and litmus tests for Supreme Court judges. However, one should not make light either of the resiliency of the American society or of the legitimacy of its democratic polity — nor of the healing power of holidays we all share.

The Communitarian Network
2130 H Street, NW, Suite 703
Washington, DC 20052
202.994.6118
comnet@gwu.edu

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Speech by CDI President Casini addressed to His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI (IT)

taken from http://www.cdi-idc.com/dbimages/pdf/casini_discorso_papa_en.pdf

Your Holiness,
In the name of the Centrist Democrat International, I should like to
express my deepest gratitude for the extraordinary opportunity that you
have bestowed by receiving us here today in Castel Gandolfo.
We are imbued with a sincere yearning for freedom, and deeply
committed to defending the dignity of man, the right to life, and the rights
of the weak, be they women, children or ethnic and religious minorities, in
the face of all forms of repression and violence.
The more than one hundred political parties that we represent are
conscious that the times we live in are replete with incongruities.
In difficult areas of the world such as Asia, we are battling religious
fundamentalism in defence of the right of each and everyone to profess
their religious affiliations and beliefs, while fully respecting an effective
dialogue between religions.
In Africa, we are engaged in building a just society based on a
commitment to combating poverty and misery.
In Latin America, we fight a daily battle of resistance against
populist politics that offer facile and misleading solutions to the
exploitation of the weakest members of society.
Meanwhile, here in Europe, the most industrialised and advanced
area of the world, we seek to counter the insidious threat of relativism,
which, by equally subtle methods, seeks to subjugate the dignity of the
human person. The weakening of our sense of conscience, the absence of powerful
motivating ideals, the crisis of fundamental institutions such as the family,
the permanent threat to the right to life for all, from the moment of
conception to advanced old age, and the ascendancy of a science that
knows no ethics or boundaries and manipulates and humiliates man, are all
pieces in a mosaic that, were it ever completed, would spell out the
destruction of western civilisation.
As you reminded us in your writings, a misguided conception of
freedom currently prevails whereby people no longer accept moral
considerations that do not tally with their own calculations, with the result
that the unrestrained expansion of freedom ends up by destroying freedom
itself.
Holy Father, your living magisterium is a simple, yet also an intense
and clear reminder of the centrality of mankind and of the ethic of
responsibility, as well as the ultimate reference point for the Christian
identity.
In espousing these values, we today confirm our pledge to opposing
all policies that threaten mankind.
We know that the secularism of public institutions and States cannot
suppress the innate longing in humans for that which is religious. There is
no such thing as healthy secularism without God and religion!
In carrying out our actions, we find comfort and encouragement in
the testimony of the Catholic Church and, above all, in your teachings.
Your Holiness, through simplicity and powerful acts, you enjoin us
to be courageous.
This is a commitment we shall not forsake, and we ask you for your
support and look to your words to guide us in our political action.